Commodity Price Volatility in the Biofuel Era: An Examination of the Linkage between Energy and Agricultural Markets
No hay miniatura disponible
Fecha
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Resumen
Descripción
Agricultural and energy commodity prices have traditionally exhibited relatively low –
even negative correlation. However, the recent increases in biofuel production have
altered the agriculture-energy relationship in a fundamental way. The amount of corn
utilized for ethanol production in the US has increased from 5% in 2001 to over one-third
by the end of the decade. This increase has drawn corn previously sold to other uses
(exports, food, feed), as well as acreage devoted to other crops (e.g., oilseeds and other
grains). In addition, there has been an increase in the demand for production inputs,
especially fertilizers, which are heavily energy-intensive. In short, the previous “biofuel
decade” has led to significant changes in the US, and indeed the global economy.
In the next five years, the U.S. Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) envisions a further boost
of ethanol production to 15 billion gallons per year. This might be expected to further
strengthen the linkage between energy prices and agricultural commodity markets.
However, unless oil prices rise sharply, it is likely that the RFS will be binding in 2015 –
that is, the amount of ethanol consumed will be determined by government mandates
rather than by the relative price of oil vs. corn-based ethanol. Under such a scenario, with
an even larger share of corn production going to ethanol, and with that source of demand
potentially becoming unresponsive to price, there is potential for significant increases in
commodity market volatility. Indeed, we estimate that, in the presence of a binding RFS,
the inherent volatility in the US coarse grains market will rise by about one-quarter. And
the volatility of the US coarse grains price to supply side shocks in that market will rise
by nearly one-half.
Under a high oil price scenario, we expect that, rather than the RFS binding, the binding
constraint is likely to be the “blend wall”, i.e. the legal % content of ethanol in gasoline
used by regular automobiles. (This is currently set at 10%.) With a binding blend wall,
we see similar, although somewhat smaller, increases in market volatility. If both the RFS
and the blend wall are simultaneously binding, then US coarse grains price volatility in
response to corn supply shocks is 57% higher than in the non-binding case, and world
price volatility is boosted by 25%. In short, we envision a future in which agricultural
price volatility – particularly for biofuel feedstocks – will depend critically on renewable
energy policies. Indeed, these may dominate the traditional importance of agricultural
commodity policies in many markets.
