The economics of the Food versus Biodiversity debate

dc.creatorMartinet, Vincent
dc.date2017-04-01T15:08:38Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T08:19:46Z
dc.descriptionEcologists discuss the “food versus biodiversity” trade-offs in the fol- lowing terms: what is the land use configuration that minimizes biodiver- sity loss for a given food production target. This is, in economic terms, a cost-effectiveness approach related to the concept of Pareto-efficiency in the food-biodiversity outcomes map. This paper argues that economists should participate in this debate. A first set of results shows how the introduction of some basic micro-economic considerations modifies or reinforces the rec- ommendations of the ecological literature on how to preserve biodiversity while producing food. A second set of arguments emphasizes that it is not necessarily sensible, from an economic point of view, to set the debate in terms of food versus biodiversity. A wider, welfarist approach should be used.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.182800
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/182800/files/Martinet-The_economics_of_the_food_versus_biodiversity_debate-508_a.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/182800
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/597953
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/182800
dc.titleThe economics of the Food versus Biodiversity debate
dc.typeText

Archivos