Reconciling conservation and development requires enhanced integration and broader aims: A cross- continental assessment of landscape approaches

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorEstrada Carmona, Natalia
dc.creatorCarmenta, Rachel
dc.creatorReed, James
dc.creatorBetemariam, Ermias
dc.creatorDeclerck, Fabrice
dc.creatorFalk, Thomas
dc.creatorHart, Abigail K
dc.creatorJones, Sarah K
dc.creatorKleinschroth, Fritz
dc.creatorMcCartney, Matthew P.
dc.creatorMeinzen-Dick, Ruth S.
dc.creatorMilder, Jeff
dc.creatorQuintero, Marcela
dc.creatorRemans, Roseline
dc.creatorValbuena, Diego
dc.creatorWillement, Louise
dc.creatorZanzanaini, Camilla
dc.creatorZhang, Wei
dc.date2024-10
dc.date2024-09-23T19:54:46Z
dc.date2024-09-23T19:54:46Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T13:23:28Z
dc.descriptionExpectations for agricultural landscapes in subtropical and tropical regions are high, aiming for conservation and development amid climate change, unfair trade, poverty, and environmental degradation. Landscape approaches (LAs) are gaining momentum as means to reconcile expectations, although they face multiple challenges, including unclear distinctions among LAs and stakeholder involvement. We studied 380 LAs from three continents via questionnaires with landscape managers (2012–2015 and 2021) and identified three LA types through cluster analysis: an ‘‘integrated’’ type with longer-term, multisectoral goals involving various stakeholders early in the design and two shorter-term types focused on sectoral priorities of preservation or production. Better-performing LAs are associated with longevity, inclusivity, and diversified investments across goals, notably those enabling social justice. International stakeholder analysis shows broad support for LAs but identifies gaps between support and LAs’ needs. The growing interest in LAs is promising. Yet, underpinning effective and lasting LAs that reconcile multiple expectations requires better support.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/152357
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/57908
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsOpen Access
dc.sourceEstrada Carmona, N.; Carmenta, R.; Reed, J.; Betemariam, E.; Declerck, F.; Falk, T.; Hart, A.K.; Jones, S.K.; Kleinschroth, F.; McCartney, M.; Meinzen-Dick, R.; Milder, J.; Quintero, M.; Remans, R.; Valbuena, D.; Willement, L.; Zanzanaini, C.; Zhang, W. (2024) Reconciling conservation and development requires enhanced integration and broader aims: A cross-continental assessment of landscape approaches. One Earth 7 (10) : p.1858-1873. ISSN: 2590-3330.
dc.subjectdiversification
dc.subjectagriculture
dc.subjectresilience
dc.subjectlandscape approaches
dc.titleReconciling conservation and development requires enhanced integration and broader aims: A cross- continental assessment of landscape approaches
dc.typeJournal Article

Archivos

Colecciones

Alianza Bioversity International y CIAT