Hedging Alberta Government's Oil and Gas Revenue: Is Acting Like a Farmer a Viable Strategy?

dc.creatorHotz, Joffre
dc.creatorUnterschultz, James R.
dc.date2017-04-01T19:16:58Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T05:15:19Z
dc.descriptionThe provincial government of Alberta in Canada experiences significant annual revenue variability arising from changes in crude oil and natural gas prices. This research evaluated whether Alberta’s non-renewable revenue risk could be managed using a derivatives hedging program. Results from a historical hedging simulation approach suggested that such a program would not have been the most effective method of managing revenue risk over the period of 1995-96 to 2003-04. Total impacts of hedging would have varied from Can-$8 Billion to Can $6 Billion over this time period. These results suggest the Alberta government explore alternative methods to manage non-renewable resource revenue risk.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.91401
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/91401/files/sp-09-01.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/91401
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/561153
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/91401
dc.titleHedging Alberta Government's Oil and Gas Revenue: Is Acting Like a Farmer a Viable Strategy?
dc.typeText

Archivos