How best to incorporate conjunctive water management into international water law: legal amendment, instrument coupling, or new protocol adoption?

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorIbrahim, I. A.
dc.creatorLautze, Jonathan F.
dc.date2023-09
dc.date2023-06-20T07:14:08Z
dc.date2023-06-20T07:14:08Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T18:33:25Z
dc.descriptionInternational water conventions—e.g., the 1997 United Nations Convention on the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses—include positive but insufficient focus on groundwater and its interaction with surface water. As such, a growing body of literature has proposed modifications to existing frameworks to enable consideration to surface and groundwater and their interactions. While this literature places considerable focus on coupling and amending existing legal frameworks, elaboration and evaluation of a new protocol on conjunctive water management comprises a key gap. To fill this gap, this paper seeks to answer the following question: does formulation and adoption of a new “conjunctive” protocol provide more value than existing proposals centered around modifications to existing law? This paper seeks to compare benefits associated with current proposals to strengthen the international legal framework for management of surface–groundwater interaction, vis-a-vis adoption of a new protocol on conjunctive management of transboundary freshwaters. To do so, the authors use doctrinal legal methods to analyze the existing main instruments globally assessing the degree to which they consider key interlinkages between surface water and groundwater. Then, the paper examines the concept of conjunctive water management and deduces tenets that should be pursued in shared waters to achieve this objective. To identify the preferred option to support conjunctive water management in international water law, the paper explores the degree to which existing proposals vs a new protocol enable an embrace of these tenets of conjunctive water management. The paper finds that while a new protocol may add greater value in advancing conjunctive water management, multiple options can and should be concurrently pursued. In particular, the authors argue that new protocols to the existing treaties must be adopted in combination with the amendment of the Draft Articles on the Law of Transboundary Aquifers. Benefits of doing so include more effective management of transboundary freshwater resources that are interconnected hydrologically, a less fragmented and more consistent international water regime, and ultimately more benefits accruing to the populations and environmental goods dependent on shared water resources.
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/130758
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/159318
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.rightsOpen Access
dc.sourceIbrahim, I. A.; Lautze, Jonathan. 2023. How best to incorporate conjunctive water management into international water law: legal amendment, instrument coupling, or new protocol adoption?. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 23(3):333-353. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-023-09602-0]
dc.subjectwater management
dc.subjectconjunctive use
dc.subjectinternational waters
dc.subjectinternational law
dc.subjectwater law
dc.subjecttransboundary waters
dc.subjectlegal frameworks
dc.subjectwatercourses
dc.subjectconventions
dc.subjectsurface water
dc.subjectgroundwater
dc.subjectaquifers
dc.subjectwater resources
dc.subjectpolicies
dc.subjectinternational agreements
dc.subjecttreaties
dc.titleHow best to incorporate conjunctive water management into international water law: legal amendment, instrument coupling, or new protocol adoption?
dc.typeJournal Article

Archivos

Colecciones

Instituto Internacional para el Manejo del Agua (IWMI)