Grazing intensities versus stocking methods: Implications for greenhouse gas emissions in integrated crop-livestock systems.

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributorDIEGO FERNANDES DE BASTOS, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL; VICENTE JOSÉ LAAMON PINTO SIMÕES, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL; JEAN VÍCTOR SAVIAN, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA; CAROLINA BREMM, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL; JEFERSON DIEKOW, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; TAISE ROBINSON KUNRATH, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL; ALEXANDRE BERNDT, CPPSE; PAULO CÉSAR DE FACCIO CARVALHO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL; CIMÉLIO BAYER, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL.
dc.creatorBASTOS, D. F. de
dc.creatorSIMÕES, V. J. L. P.
dc.creatorSAVIAN, J. V.
dc.creatorBREMM, C.
dc.creatorDIEKOW, J.
dc.creatorKUNRATH, T. R.
dc.creatorBERNDT, A.
dc.creatorCARVALHO, P. C. de F.
dc.creatorBAYER, C.
dc.date2026-03-02T17:48:38Z
dc.date2026-03-02T17:48:38Z
dc.date2026-03-02
dc.date2026
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T05:34:59Z
dc.descriptionPredicted global warming of 2.7 ◦C by the end of the century threatens the Paris Agreement targets, underscoring the need for improved food-system management to increase productivity while reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Integrated crop–livestock systems (ICLS) represent a promising pathway, although important uncertainties remain regarding the balance between carbon dioxide (CO2) removal and methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. Therefore, this study assessed how stocking methods (continuous vs. rotational) and grazing intensities (moderate vs. low) affect the global warming potential (GWP) and GHG emission intensity (GHGI) of ICLS relative to ungrazed areas. The experiment combined soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and maize (Zea mays L.) in rotation with Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) grazed by sheep. Over three years, GWP (kg CO2eq ha 1 yr 1) was quantified based on net CO2, N2O, and CH4 emissions, together with the energy costs of farming operations. ICLS produced more crude protein (grain plus meat) than ungrazed areas (842.4 ±53.2 vs. 586.6 ±20.0 kg ha 1 yr 1; P <0.01), corresponding to a 44 % increase. However, ICLS was a net GHG source (+1786.5 kg CO2-eq ha 1 yr 1; P <0.01), with sheep enteric CH4 emission accounting for approximately 49 % of total GWP. Moderate grazing intensity increased GHGI relative to low grazing intensity (6.19 ±0.27 vs. 4.47 ± 0.32 kg CO2-eq kg 1 crude protein yr 1; P <0.01) across stocking methods. Overall, grazing intensity had a greater influence on GHGI than stocking method, identifying grazing intensity as the primary lever for emission intensity control in ICLS. Despite enteric CH4 emissions, these findings highlight that ICLS can be optimized through management to reconcile productivity and climate mitigation.
dc.identifierJournal of Agriculture and Food Research, v. 26, article number 102730, 2026.
dc.identifier2666-1543
dc.identifierhttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1184842
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2026.102730
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/495740
dc.languageeng
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectMudança Climática
dc.subjectEfeito Estufa
dc.subjectConservação do Solo
dc.subjectConservação
dc.subjectClimate change
dc.subjectIntegrated agricultural systems
dc.subjectGreenhouse gas emissions
dc.subjectGrazing management
dc.subjectCarbon sequestration
dc.titleGrazing intensities versus stocking methods: Implications for greenhouse gas emissions in integrated crop-livestock systems.
dc.typeArtigo de periódico

Archivos

Colecciones

Embrapa Pecuaria Sudeste (CPPSE)