Do Input Subsidies Reduce Poverty among Smallholder Farm Households? Panel Survey Evidence from Zambia

dc.creatorMason, Nicole
dc.creatorTembo, Solomon
dc.date2017-04-01T17:24:39Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T09:53:27Z
dc.descriptionMany of the ‘new’ agricultural input subsidy programs (ISPs) in sub-Saharan Africa include among their objectives raising farm incomes and reducing rural poverty, but there is a dearth of empirical evidence on whether ISPs are achieving these objectives. Focusing on the case of Zambia, where ISPs account for approximately 50% of all agricultural sector poverty reduction program expenditures, we use nationally-representative panel survey data to estimate the effects of ISP fertilizer on smallholder farm household incomes, poverty incidence, and poverty severity based on the US$2 and US$1.25/capita/day poverty lines. Panel data (fixed effects and correlated random effects) and instrumental variables/control function methods are used to correct for the potential endogeneity of subsidized fertilizer to household incomes and poverty status. Results suggest that although ISP fertilizer raises incomes, the increase is not large enough or widely distributed enough to substantively reduce poverty incidence or severity among smallholder farm households in Zambia.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.212448
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/212448/files/Mason-Do%20Input%20Subsidies%20Reduce%20Poverty%20among%20Smallholder%20Farm%20Households%20Panel%20Survey%20Evidence-1058.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/212448
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/613340
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/212448
dc.titleDo Input Subsidies Reduce Poverty among Smallholder Farm Households? Panel Survey Evidence from Zambia
dc.typeText

Archivos