Assessing the potential cost of a failed Doha Round

dc.creatorBouët, Antoine
dc.creatorLaborde Debucquet, David
dc.date2010-04
dc.date2024-10-01T13:55:18Z
dc.date2024-10-01T13:55:18Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:33:37Z
dc.descriptionThis study offers new conclusions on the economic cost of a failed Doha Development Agenda (DDA). We assess potential outcome of the Doha Round as well as four protectionist scenarios using the MIRAGE Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model. In a scenario where applied tariffs of World Trade Organization (WTO) economies would go up to currently bound tariff rates, world trade would decrease by 9.9% and world welfare by US$353 billion. The economic cost of a failed DDA is here evaluated by the difference between a cooperative scenario (DDA) and a protectionist one (US$412 billion in terms of welfare). Another point of view is to compare a resort to protectionism when the DDA is implemented with a resort to protectionism when the DDA is not implemented. The findings show that this trade agreement could prevent the potential reduction of US$809 billion of trade and, therefore, acts as an efficient multilateral ‘preventive’ scheme against the adverse consequences of trade ‘beggar-thy-neighbor’ policies.
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/152870
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/107815
dc.languageen
dc.publisherCambridge University Press
dc.rightsLimited Access
dc.sourceBouët, Antoine; Laborde Debucquet, David. 2010. Assessing the potential cost of a failed Doha Round. World Trade Review 9(2): 319-351. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745609990267
dc.subjectmodels
dc.titleAssessing the potential cost of a failed Doha Round
dc.typeJournal Article

Archivos