Social Capital and Political Accountability

dc.creatorNannicini, Tommaso
dc.creatorStella, Andrea
dc.creatorTabellini, Guido
dc.creatorTroiano, Ugo
dc.date2017-04-01T19:32:30Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T05:14:47Z
dc.descriptionIn this paper, we empirically investigate a channel through which social capital may improve economic wellbeing and the functioning of institutions: political accountability. The main idea is that voters who share norms of generalized morality demand higher standards of behavior on their elected representavtives, are more willing to bear the cost of acquiring information, and are more likely to base their vote on criteria of social welfare rather than (narrow) personal interest. We take this conjecture to the data using information on the Italian members of Parliament in the postwar period (1948–2001). The empirical evidence shows that the electoral punishment of political misbehavior is considerably larger in electoral districts with high social capital, where social capital is measured by blood donation, and political misbehavior refers to receiving a request of criminal prosecution or shirking in parliamentary activity. Accordingly, episodes of political misbehavior are less frequent in electoral districts with high social capital.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.90944
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/90944/files/NDL2010-058A.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/90944
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/561015
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/90944
dc.titleSocial Capital and Political Accountability
dc.typeText

Archivos