Gender attitudes in agriculture and positivity bias: A survey experiment in four countries in Sub-Saharan Africa

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorRagasa, Catherine
dc.creatorLambrecht, Isabel B.
dc.creatorMa, Ning
dc.creatorCole, Steven
dc.creatorEbrahim, Mohammed
dc.creatorDesta, Gizaw
dc.creatorMersha, Abiro Tigabie
dc.creatorMudereri, B.T.
dc.creatorKihiu, Evelyne
dc.creatorKreye, Christine
dc.creatorPeter, Hellen
dc.date2025-09-16
dc.date2025-09-17T12:53:31Z
dc.date2025-09-17T12:53:31Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:17:23Z
dc.descriptionExtensive prior research has demonstrated that reducing gender discrimination enhances women’s empowerment, promotes more inclusive livelihoods, increases agricultural productivity, and improves other development outcomes. This study aims to contribute to documenting and informing the measurement of gender attitudes that relate directly to reaching, benefiting, and empowering women through agricultural innovations. By analyzing data from 8,051 survey respondents across study sites in Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Nigeria, and Rwanda, our findings emphasize both commonalities and differences in gender attitudes across different contexts. Furthermore, by including a survey-based experiment during data collection, we assess whether gender-attitude statements vary depending on whether they are presented in a positive frame (focusing on equality) or in a negative frame (focusing on inequality). On average, rural women and men respondents across all countries supported more than half of the gender-equality statements. Some gender-inequality attitudes persisted across the four countries but varied in magnitude and by location, age group, and specific statement or theme. Framing matters: respondents exposed to a positive framing supported 16 percent more gender-equality statements than those exposed to a negative framing. The study highlights two main implications. First, the findings indicate the importance of considering both restrictive attitudes and those that reflect gender-equality opportunities as being in the vanguard. Accordingly, gender-focused interventions should adopt strategies that challenge normative views of women as supporting rather than leading actors in agriculture and economic activities. Second, gender-attitude measures do not perfectly align with country-level gender-equality indicators or with empowerment at the intrahousehold level. They therefore capture a distinct dimension and merit their own indicators.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/176542
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/100074
dc.languageen
dc.publisherInternational Food Policy Research Institute
dc.relationhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/135665
dc.relationhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/143588
dc.relationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111686
dc.relationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2022.103026
dc.rightsOpen Access
dc.sourceRagasa, Catherine; Lambrecht, Isabel B.; Ma, Ning; Cole, Steven; Ebrahim, Mohammed; Desta, Gizaw; et al. 2025. Gender attitudes in agriculture and positivity bias: A survey experiment in four countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. IFPRI Discussion Paper 2357. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/176542
dc.subjectagriculture
dc.subjectdevelopment
dc.subjectgender
dc.subjectlivelihoods
dc.subjectwomen’s empowerment
dc.titleGender attitudes in agriculture and positivity bias: A survey experiment in four countries in Sub-Saharan Africa
dc.typeWorking Paper

Archivos

Colecciones

Instituto Internacional de Investigación sobre Políticas Alimentarias (IFPRI)