The Puzzle of Valuation Gaps Between Experimental Auction and Real Choice Experiments: Do Purchase Intention and Price Bargaining Preference Matter?

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorXie, Jing
dc.creatorGao, Zhifeng
dc.creatorHouse, Lisa
dc.date2017-08-04T13:45:28Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T07:12:41Z
dc.descriptionThis article examines the preferences revealed by two non-hypothetical experiments. We found that WTP estimates from real choice experiment are significantly than auction bids. We provide two possible reasons for it: consumers’ purchase intention and aggressiveness in price bargaining. Our results suggest that the discrepancies among experiments can come from the heterogeneity of respondents’ price bargaining aggressiveness, but not from purchase intention differences.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.151282
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/151282/files/oBVxhSo1.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/151282
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/585735
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/151282
dc.titleThe Puzzle of Valuation Gaps Between Experimental Auction and Real Choice Experiments: Do Purchase Intention and Price Bargaining Preference Matter?
dc.typeText

Archivos

Colecciones

University of Minnesota