Characterizing Spatial Pattern in Ecosystem Service Values when Distance Decay Doesn’t Apply: Choice Experiments and Local Indicators of Spatial Association

dc.creatorJohnston, Robert J.
dc.creatorRamachandran, Mahesh
dc.creatorSchultz, Eric T.
dc.creatorSegerson, Kathleen
dc.creatorBesedin, Elena Y.
dc.date2017-04-01T14:32:44Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T05:33:40Z
dc.descriptionStated preference analyses commonly impose strong and unrealistic assumptions in response to spatial welfare heterogeneity. These include spatial homogeneity or continuous distance decay. Despite their ubiquity in the valuation literature, global assumptions such as these have been increasingly abandoned by non-economics disciplines in favor of approaches that allow for spatial patchiness. This paper develops parallel methods to evaluate local patchiness and hot spots in stated preference welfare estimates, characterizing relevant patterns overlooked by traditional approaches. The analysis draws from a choice experiment addressing river restoration. Results demonstrate shortcomings in standard treatments of spatial heterogeneity and insights available through alternative methods.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.103374
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/103374/files/Johnston%20et%20al.%20AAEA%202011%2012921.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/103374
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/565301
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/103374
dc.titleCharacterizing Spatial Pattern in Ecosystem Service Values when Distance Decay Doesn’t Apply: Choice Experiments and Local Indicators of Spatial Association
dc.typeText

Archivos