Livelihood, cash transfer, and graduation approaches: How do they compare in terms of cost, impact, and targeting?

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorSulaiman, Munshi
dc.date2018-10-04
dc.date2024-06-21T09:13:37Z
dc.date2024-06-21T09:13:37Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T14:56:55Z
dc.descriptionChapter 8 provides a comparative analysis of 48 graduation, livelihood, and cash transfer programs. Using income and consumption as the primary metrics of impact and focusing on long-term outcomes, the author assesses the sustainability of impact of these programs and compares both costs and impacts across the three types of approaches.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/147363
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/90269
dc.languageen
dc.publisherInternational Food Policy Research Institute
dc.rightsOpen Access
dc.sourceSulaiman, Munshi. 2018. Livelihood, cash transfer, and graduation approaches: How do they compare in terms of cost, impact, and targeting? In Boosting growth to end hunger by 2025: The role of social protection, eds. Fleur Stephanie Wouterse and Alemayehu Seyoum Taffesse. Chapter 8, Pp. 102-120. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://hdl.handle.net/10568/147363
dc.subjectincome
dc.subjectcosts
dc.subjecteducation
dc.subjecteconomic growth
dc.subjectprogrammes
dc.subjectconsumption
dc.subjectcost benefit analysis
dc.subjectsocial policies
dc.subjectsocial welfare
dc.subjectlivelihoods
dc.subjectrural development
dc.subjectcash transfers
dc.subjectpoverty
dc.subjectproject evaluation
dc.titleLivelihood, cash transfer, and graduation approaches: How do they compare in terms of cost, impact, and targeting?
dc.typeBook Chapter

Archivos

Colecciones

Instituto Internacional de Investigación sobre Políticas Alimentarias (IFPRI)