Economic Impacts of Carbon Taxes and Biomass Feedstock Usage in Southeastern United States Coal Utilities

dc.creatorEnglish, Burton C.
dc.creatorJensen, Kimberly L.
dc.creatorMenard, R. Jamey
dc.creatorWalsh, Marie E.
dc.creatorBrandt, Craig
dc.creatorVan Dyke, Jim
dc.creatorHadley, Stanton
dc.date2017-04-01T19:22:32Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T02:48:23Z
dc.descriptionThe Southeastern United States depends on coal to supply 60% of its electricity needs. The region leads in CO2 emissions and ranks second in emissions of SO2 and NO2. Compared with coal, biomass feedstocks have lower emission levels of sulfur or sulfur compounds and can potentially reduce nitrogen oxide emissions. This study examines the economic impacts of cofiring level scenarios. Economic impacts are estimated for producing, collecting, and transporting feedstock; retrofitting coal-fired utilities for burning feedstock; operating cofired utilities; and coal displaced from burning the feedstock.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.6634
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/6634/files/39010103.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/6634
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/520377
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/6634
dc.titleEconomic Impacts of Carbon Taxes and Biomass Feedstock Usage in Southeastern United States Coal Utilities
dc.typeText

Archivos