Comparison between Day 0 and traditional protocols for estrus synchronization and multiple ovulation in crossbred hair sheep.

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributorLivia Correia Magalhães; Edilson Soares Lopes Júnior; Aionne de Souza Leite Guimarães; Mayara de Souza Miranda; Thais Thatiane dos Santos Souza; Alane Pains Oliveira do Monte; Ana Arlete de Amorim Silva; Ludmila Souza Sampaio; Thiago Vinicius Costa Nascimento; Pedro Humberto Felix de Sousa; DANIEL MAIA NOGUEIRA, CPATSA; Mabel Freitas Cordeiro.
dc.creatorMAGALHÃES, L. C.
dc.creatorLOPES JÚNIOR, E. S.
dc.creatorGUIMARÃES, A. de S. L.
dc.creatorMIRANDA, M. de S.
dc.creatorSOUZA, T. T. dos S.
dc.creatorMONTE, A. P. O. de
dc.creatorSILVA, A. A. de A.
dc.creatorSAMPAIO, L. S.
dc.creatorNASCIMENTO, T. V. C.
dc.creatorSOUSA, P. H. F. de
dc.creatorNOGUEIRA, D. M.
dc.creatorCORDEIRO, M. F.
dc.date2019-12-27T18:17:24Z
dc.date2019-12-27T18:17:24Z
dc.date2019-12-27
dc.date2019
dc.date2019-12-27T18:17:24Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T05:55:34Z
dc.descriptionThis study was carried out to compare Day 0 and traditional protocols for in vivo embryo production. Twenty-two crossbred ewes were used as embryo donors and assigned to two groups. Ewes from Traditional protocol were submitted to estrus synchronization with CIDR for 14 days and superovulation treatment was induced 60 h before the withdrawal of CIDR with 240 mg pFSH. Donors from Day 0 protocol were subjected to a short-term protocol of estrus synchronization (6 days) and superovulation treatment was the same to the other group, but it started 84 h after CIDR withdrawal. Embryo recoveries were performed using the transcervical method. All embryo donors (100%) presented estrus regardless of the hormone protocol used. The treatments did not affect the ovarian response, as well as quality and viability of embryos (P > 0.05). Treatments had a small dispersion of estrus, 81.81% (9/11) animals from the Traditional protocol group presented estrus 20 h after CIDR withdrawal and 90.9% (10/11) of the Day 0 protocol group presented estrus 24 h. Regarding embryo production, there was no significant difference between hormonal treatments for the different parameters evaluated (P > 0.05). It can be concluded that the Day 0 protocol was not different from the Traditional protocol in crossbred ewes.
dc.identifierJournal of Applied Animal Research, v. 47, n. 1, p. 560-564, 2019.
dc.identifierhttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1117787
dc.identifier10.1080/09712119.2019.1687307
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/502711
dc.languageeng
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectOvelha mestiça
dc.subjectEmbriões in vivo
dc.subjectOvelhas do protocolo Tradicional
dc.subjectProtocolo hormonal
dc.subjectTratamentos hormonais
dc.subjectOvelha
dc.subjectSuperovulação
dc.subjectSheep
dc.titleComparison between Day 0 and traditional protocols for estrus synchronization and multiple ovulation in crossbred hair sheep.
dc.typeArtigo de periódico

Archivos

Colecciones

Embrapa Semi-Árido (CPATSA)