Preferences for Residential Development Attributes and Support for the Policy Process: Implications for Management and Conservation of Rural Landscapes
| dc.creator | Johnston, Robert J. | |
| dc.creator | Swallow, Stephen K. | |
| dc.creator | Bauer, Dana Marie | |
| dc.creator | Anderson, Christopher M. | |
| dc.date | 2017-04-01T19:39:19Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-09T04:12:52Z | |
| dc.description | The rural public may not only be concerned with the consequences of land management; residents may also have systematic preferences for policy instruments applied to management goals. Preferences for outcomes do not necessarily imply matching support for the underlying policy process. This study assesses relationships among support for elements of the policy process and preferences for management outcomes. Preferences are examined within the context of alternative proposals to manage growth and conserve landscape attributes in southern New England. Results are based on (a) stated preferences estimated from a multi-attribute contingent choice survey of rural residents, and (b) Likert-scale assessment of strength of support for land use policy tools. Findings indicate general but not universal correlation among policy support indicators and preferences for associated land use outcomes, but also confirm the suspicion that policy support and land use preference may not always coincide. | |
| dc.identifier | doi:10.22004/ag.econ.31346 | |
| dc.identifier | https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/31346/files/32010065.pdf | |
| dc.identifier | http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/31346 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/546515 | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | ||
| dc.source | http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/31346 | |
| dc.title | Preferences for Residential Development Attributes and Support for the Policy Process: Implications for Management and Conservation of Rural Landscapes | |
| dc.type | Text |