Decoupled Programs, Payment Incidence, and Factor Markets: Evidence from Market Experiments

dc.creatorBastian, Christopher T.
dc.creatorNagler, Amy M.
dc.creatorMenkhaus, Dale J.
dc.creatorEhmke, Mariah D.
dc.creatorWhitaker, James B.
dc.creatorYoung, C. Edwin
dc.date2017-04-01T18:30:18Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T05:35:36Z
dc.descriptionWe use laboratory market experiments to assess the impact of asymmetric knowledge of a per-unit subsidy and the effect of a decoupled annual income subsidy on factor market outcomes. Results indicate that when the subsidy is tied to the factor as a per-unit subsidy, regardless of full or asymmetric knowledge for market participants, subsidized factor buyers distribute nearly 22 percent of the subsidy to factor sellers. When the subsidy is fully decoupled from the factor, as is the case with the annual payment, payment incidence is mitigated and prices are not statistically different from the no-policy treatment.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.104108
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/104108/files/Decoupled%20Programs%20Payment%20Incidence%20and%20Factor%20Markets%202011%20AAEA%20Selected%20Paper_final.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/104108
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/565781
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/104108
dc.titleDecoupled Programs, Payment Incidence, and Factor Markets: Evidence from Market Experiments
dc.typeText

Archivos