Biochar as an agrifood innovation: evidence and lessons for integration into agricultural landscapes
| dc.creator | Somorin, Tosin | |
| dc.creator | Akanno, C. | |
| dc.creator | Osei-Amponsah, Charity | |
| dc.creator | Gebrezgabher, Solomie A. | |
| dc.creator | Mupangwa, W. | |
| dc.creator | Adamtey, Noah | |
| dc.creator | Nartey, Eric Gbenatey | |
| dc.creator | Lord, R. | |
| dc.creator | Ennis, C. | |
| dc.creator | Zhang, X. | |
| dc.creator | Fletcher, A. | |
| dc.creator | Lue, L. | |
| dc.creator | Li, J. | |
| dc.date | 2025-12-30 | |
| dc.date | 2026-01-21T18:03:08Z | |
| dc.date | 2026-01-21T18:03:08Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-27T18:36:36Z | |
| dc.description | This report examines biochar as an agrifood innovation within circular bioeconomy and multifunctional landscape frameworks, with a focus on its relevance for smallholder agriculture in the Global South. Produced from organic residues through thermochemical processes, biochar offers a pathway to restore degraded soils, valorize waste, and support climate mitigation and adaptation. Evidence shows that biochar can improve soil structure, nutrient retention, and water-holding capacity, enhancing crop resilience in sandy and drought-prone environments while reducing reliance on synthetic inputs. However, its effectiveness is highly context-dependent. Outcomes vary with feedstock quality, production technology, soil conditions, and application practices. Risks include inconsistent agronomic performance, potential contamination, feedstock competition, and uncertain climate benefits when full life-cycle impacts are overlooked. Slow pyrolysis is the most suitable option for low-cost, rural settings, while advanced technologies remain less accessible. Biochar is therefore neither a silver bullet nor a flawed concept, but a promising tool whose benefits depend on careful design, regulation, and integration into locally appropriate, inclusive systems. | |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/180325 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/160730 | |
| dc.language | en | |
| dc.publisher | International Water Management Institute | |
| dc.rights | Open Access | |
| dc.source | Somorin, T.; Akanno, C.; Osei-Amponsah, C.; Gebrezgabher, S.; Mupangwa, W.; Adamtey, N.; Nartey, E. G.; Lord, R.; Ennis, C.; Zhang, X.; Fletcher, A.; Lue, L.; Li, J. 2025. Biochar as an agrifood innovation: evidence and lessons for integration into agricultural landscapes. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). 76p. (Resource Recovery and Reuse Series 27). doi: https://doi.org/10.5337/2025.253 | |
| dc.subject | resource recovery | |
| dc.subject | resource management | |
| dc.subject | reuse | |
| dc.subject | waste management | |
| dc.subject | biochar | |
| dc.subject | agrifood systems | |
| dc.subject | innovation systems | |
| dc.subject | agricultural landscape | |
| dc.subject | agricultural soils | |
| dc.subject | soil quality | |
| dc.subject | soil fertility | |
| dc.subject | organic wastes | |
| dc.subject | climate change mitigation | |
| dc.subject | climate change adaptation | |
| dc.subject | climate resilience | |
| dc.subject | soil water retention | |
| dc.subject | nutrient availability | |
| dc.subject | biomass | |
| dc.subject | carbon sequestration | |
| dc.subject | soil organic carbon | |
| dc.subject | feedstocks | |
| dc.subject | business models | |
| dc.subject | smallholders | |
| dc.subject | farmers | |
| dc.subject | small-scale farming | |
| dc.subject | circular economy | |
| dc.subject | bioeconomy | |
| dc.subject | technology | |
| dc.subject | pyrolysis | |
| dc.subject | risk | |
| dc.subject | regulations | |
| dc.subject | Global South | |
| dc.title | Biochar as an agrifood innovation: evidence and lessons for integration into agricultural landscapes | |
| dc.type | Report |
