Can information drive demand for safer food? Impact of brand-specific recommendations and test results on product choice

dc.creatorWairimu Kariuki, Sarah
dc.creatorHoffmann, Vivian
dc.date2022-05
dc.date2024-04-12T13:37:36Z
dc.date2024-04-12T13:37:36Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:38:26Z
dc.descriptionAs an unobservable attribute, food safety is likely to be under-provided by markets where regulatory enforcement is weak. In such settings, stimulating consumer demand for safer food can potentially encourage market actors to invest in food safety. Through a randomized trial in Kenya, we test the impact of informing consumers about which maize flour brands are most likely to comply with the regulatory standard for aflatoxin, a carcinogenic fungal byproduct. Providing information on safer brands alone does not significantly affect consumption behavior. However, when the same information is combined with a test performed on the maize flour stocked by the household, the likelihood that a safer brand is consumed 2 months later is 76% higher than in the comparison group. Our findings suggest that providing information on the relative riskiness of substitute foods could encourage consumers to make safer choices.
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/141274
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/110280
dc.languageen
dc.publisherInternational Association of Agricultural Economists
dc.rightsOpen Access
dc.sourceWairimu Kariuki, Sarah; and Hoffmann, Vivian. 2022. Can information drive demand for safer food? Impact of brand-specific recommendations and test results on product choice. Agricultural Economics 53(3): 454-467. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12685
dc.subjectconsumer behaviour
dc.subjectmaize
dc.subjectfood safety
dc.subjectaflatoxins
dc.subjectinformation
dc.titleCan information drive demand for safer food? Impact of brand-specific recommendations and test results on product choice
dc.typeJournal Article

Archivos