A Perceived Divide
No hay miniatura disponible
Fecha
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
World Bank, Jakarta
Resumen
Descripción
Inequality in Indonesia is rising and a
recent survey suggests that Indonesians are growing
increasingly concerned. The Gini coefficient in Indonesia
has increased sharply over the past 15 years, increasing
from 30 in 2000 to 41 in 2013. In a 2014 survey on public
perceptions of inequality, most Indonesians consider income
distribution in Indonesia to be very unequal or not equal at
all. In addition, half of all respondents feel that
Indonesia has become more unequal or much more unequal over
the past five years. The true extent of high inequality,
however, is worse than most people realize. Respondents
believe that the ideal income distribution is one where the
top 20 percent of the population earn as much as the bottom
40 percent. Not with standing this ideal, respondents
estimate that the actual income distribution has the top 20
percent earning as much as the bottom 60 percent. However,
the 2014 National Socio-economic Survey (Susenas 2014)
suggests that the richest 20 percent actually earn as much
as the rest of the population combined. Furthermore, because
household surveys typically do not capture the incomes of
the richest Indonesians, the real level of inequality in
Indonesia is probably even higher.
Palabras clave
EMPOWERMENT, BENEFIT, POVERTY LINE, ECONOMIC GROWTH, HOUSE, COMMUNITY GROUP, INCOME DISPARITY, POLITICS, INCOME, POVERTY RATES, INCOME QUINTILES, REGIONAL LEVEL, PROGRAMS, HEALTH INSURANCE, INCOME SOURCES, INEQUALITIES, ECONOMIC POLICY, DISPARITY IN INCOME, POOR PEOPLE, INEQUALITY REDUCTION, SUBSIDY, CORRUPTION, CONSUMPTION GROWTH, SOCIAL ASSISTANCE, MEASURES, HOME, POVERTY REDUCTION, REDUCING INEQUALITY, LABOR MARKET, PUBLIC POLICY, SAVINGS, REAL LEVEL, POOR HOUSEHOLD, PUBLIC SUPPORT, INCOME GROWTH, INCOME INEQUALITY, DOMICILE, SOCIAL INSURANCE, TRANSFERS, HOUSEHOLD INCOME, POLICY ISSUES, HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS, INCOME LEVELS, SOCIAL SECURITY, PRODUCT, FARMERS, SOCIAL INSURANCE PROGRAMS, HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS, INCOME DIFFERENCES, CASH TRANSFERS, SUBSIDIES, MINIMUM WAGES, EXTERNAL FACTORS, UNEMPLOYMENT, POVERTY LINES, CONSUMPTION, WAGES, POLICIES, FINANCIAL CRISIS, HIGHER INEQUALITY, FAMILY, WAGE INEQUALITY, GENDER, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, INCOMES, JOB CREATION, RURAL, MIDDLE CLASS, TRANSFER PROGRAMS, SURVEYS, EMPIRICAL RESEARCH, INSURANCE, JUSTICE, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, HIGH INEQUALITY, AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS, CHILDREN, EVALUATION, EQUAL DISTRIBUTION, EQUALITY, POVERTY, RURAL AREAS, COMMUNITY GROUPS, GINI COEFFICIENT, HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION, LAW, HOUSEHOLD NEEDS, CASH TRANSFER PROGRAMS, HIGH GROWTH, POVERTY RATE, RISING INEQUALITY, POOR, WOMEN, FOOD PRICES, SOCIAL ISSUES, FEMALE, BENEFITS, INCOME GROUPS, INEQUALITY, POOR HOUSEHOLDS
