Advances in legume systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification.

dc.contributorANNE BRUNEAU, UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL
dc.contributorLUCIANO PAGANUCCI DE QUEIROZ, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE FEIRA DE SANTANA
dc.contributorJENS J. RINGELBERG, UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH
dc.contributorLEONARDO M. BORGES, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SÃO CARLOS
dc.contributorROSELI LOPES DA COSTA BORTOLUZZI, UNIVERSIDADE DO ESTADO DE SANTA CATARINA
dc.contributorGILLIAN K. BROWN, QUEENSLAND HERBARIUM AND BIODIVERSITY SCIENCE
dc.contributorDOMINGOS B. O. S. CARDOSO, INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS JARDIM BOTÂNICO DO RIO DE JANEIRO
dc.contributorRUTH P. CLARK, ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS
dc.contributorADILVA DE SOUZA CONCEIÇÃO, UNIVERSIDADE DO ESTADO DA BAHIA
dc.contributorMATHEUS MARTINS TEIXEIRA COTA, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE FEIRA DE SANTANA
dc.contributorELSE DEMEULENAERE, UNIVERSITY OF GUAM
dc.contributorRODRIGO DUNO DE STEFANO, CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA DE YUCATÁN
dc.contributorJOHN E. EBINGER, EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY
dc.contributorJULIA FERM, STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY
dc.contributorANDRÉS FONSECA-CORTÉS, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE FEIRA DE SANTANA
dc.contributorEDELINE GAGNON, UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH
dc.contributorROSAURA GRETHER, UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA METROPOLITANA-IZTAPALAPA
dc.contributorETHIÉNE GUERRA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL
dc.contributorELSPETH HASTON, ROYAL BOTANIC GARDEN EDINBURGH
dc.contributorPATRICK S. HERENDEEN, CHICAGO BOTANIC GARDEN
dc.contributorHÉCTOR M. HERNÁNDEZ, UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO
dc.contributorHELEN C. F. HOPKINS, ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS
dc.contributorISAU HUAMANTUPA-CHUQUIMACO, UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AMAZÓNICA DE MADRE DE DIOS
dc.contributorCOLIN E. HUGHES, UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH
dc.contributorSTEFANIE M. ICKERT-BOND, UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS
dc.contributorJOÃO IGANCI, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL
dc.contributorERIK J. M. KOENEN, UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES
dc.contributorGWILYM P. LEWIS, ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS
dc.contributorHAROLDO CAVALCANTE DE LIMA, INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS JARDIM BOTÂNICO DO RIO DE JANEIRO
dc.contributorALEXANDRE GIBAU DE LIMA, INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS JARDIM BOTÂNICO DO RIO DE JANEIRO
dc.contributorMELISSA LUCKOW, CORNELL UNIVERSITY
dc.contributorBRIGITTE MARAZZI, NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF CANTON TICINO
dc.contributorBRUCE R. MASLIN, WESTERN AUSTRALIAN HERBARIUM
dc.contributorMATÍAS MORALES, INSTITUTO DE RECURSOS BIOLÓGICOS, BUENOS AIRES
dc.contributorMARLI PIRES MORIM, INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS JARDIM BOTÂNICO DO RIO DE JANEIRO
dc.contributorDANIEL J. MURPHY, ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS VICTORIA
dc.contributorSHAWN A. O’DONNELL, NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY
dc.contributorFILIPE GOMES OLIVEIRA, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE FEIRA DE SANTANA
dc.contributorANA CARLA DA SILVA OLIVEIRA, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE FEIRA DE SANTANA
dc.contributorJULIANA GASTALDELLO RANDO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO OESTE DA BAHIA
dc.contributorPÉTALA GOMES RIBEIRO, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE FEIRA DE SANTANA
dc.contributorCAROLINA LIMA RIBEIRO, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE FEIRA DE SANTANA
dc.contributorFELIPE DA SILVA SANTOS, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE FEIRA DE SANTANA
dc.contributorDAVID S. SEIGLER, UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
dc.contributorGUILHERME SOUSA DA SILVA, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS
dc.contributorMARCELO FRAGOMENI SIMON, CENARGEN
dc.contributorMARCOS VINÍCIUS BATISTA SOARES, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL
dc.contributorVANESSA TERRA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA MARIA.
dc.creatorBRUNEAU, A.
dc.creatorQUEIROZ, L. P. de
dc.creatorRINGELBERG, J. J.
dc.creatorBORGES, L. M.
dc.creatorBORTOLUZZI, R. L. da C.
dc.creatorBROWN, G. K.
dc.creatorCARDOSO, D. B. O. S.
dc.creatorCLARK, R. P.
dc.creatorCONCEIÇÃO, A. de S.
dc.creatorCOTA, M. M. T.
dc.creatorDEMEULENAERE, E.
dc.creatorSTEFANO, R. D. de
dc.creatorEBINGER, J. E.
dc.creatorFERM, J.
dc.creatorFONSECA-CORTÉS, A.
dc.creatorGAGNON, E.
dc.creatorGRETHER, R.
dc.creatorGUERRA, E.
dc.creatorHASTON, E.
dc.creatorHERENDEEN, P. S.
dc.creatorHERNÁNDEZ, H. M.
dc.creatorHOPKINS, H. C. F.
dc.creatorHUAMANTUPA-CHUQUIMACO, I.
dc.creatorHUGHES, C. E.
dc.creatorICKERT-BOND, S. M.
dc.creatorIGANCI, J.
dc.creatorKOENEN, E. J. M.
dc.creatorLEWIS, G. P.
dc.creatorLIMA, H. C. de
dc.creatorLIMA, A. G. de
dc.creatorLUCKOW, M.
dc.creatorMARAZZI, B.
dc.creatorMASLIN, B. R.
dc.creatorMORALES, M.
dc.creatorMORIM, M. P.
dc.creatorMURPHY, D. J.
dc.creatorO’DONNELL, S. A.
dc.creatorOLIVEIRA, F. G.
dc.creatorOLIVEIRA, A. C. da S.
dc.creatorRANDO, J. G.
dc.creatorRIBEIRO, P. G.
dc.creatorRIBEIRO, C. L.
dc.creatorSANTOS, F. da S.
dc.creatorSEIGLER, D. S.
dc.creatorSILVA, G. S. da
dc.creatorSIMON, M. F.
dc.creatorSOARES, M. V. B.
dc.creatorTERRA, V.
dc.date2024-10-17T17:53:54Z
dc.date2024-10-17T17:53:54Z
dc.date2024-10-17
dc.date2024
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T11:55:22Z
dc.descriptionCaesalpinioideae is the second largest subfamily of legumes (Leguminosae) with ca. 4680 species and 163 genera. It is an ecologically and economically important group formed of mostly woody perennials that range from large canopy emergent trees to functionally herbaceous geoxyles, lianas and shrubs, and which has a global distribution, occurring on every continent except Antarctica. Following the recent re-circumscription of 15 Caesalpinioideae genera as presented in Advances in Legume Systematics 14, Part 1, and using as a basis a phylogenomic analysis of 997 nuclear gene sequences for 420 species and all but five of the genera currently recognised in the subfamily, we present a new higher-level classification for the subfamily. The new classification of Caesalpinioideae comprises eleven tribes, all of which are either new, reinstated or re-circumscribed at this rank: Caesalpinieae Rchb. (27 genera / ca. 223 species), Campsiandreae LPWG (2 / 5–22), Cassieae Bronn (7 / 695), Ceratonieae Rchb. (4 / 6), Dimorphandreae Benth. (4 / 35), Erythrophleeae LPWG (2 /13), Gleditsieae Nakai (3 / 20), Mimoseae Bronn (100 / ca. 3510), Pterogyneae LPWG (1 / 1), Schizolobieae Nakai (8 / 42–43), Sclerolobieae Benth. & Hook. f. (5 / ca. 113). Although many of these lineages have been recognised and named in the past, either as tribes or informal generic groups, their circumscriptions have varied widely and changed over the past decades, such that all the tribes described here differ in generic membership from those previously recognised. Importantly, the approximately 3500 species and 100 genera of the former subfamily Mimosoideae are now placed in the reinstated, but newly circumscribed, tribe Mimoseae. Because of the large size and ecological importance of the tribe, we also provide a clade-based classification system for Mimoseae that includes 17 named lower-level clades. Fourteen of the 100 Mimoseae genera remain unplaced in these lower-level clades: eight are resolved in two grades and six are phylogenetically isolated monogeneric lineages. In addition to the new classification, we provide a key to genera, morphological descriptions and notes for all 163 genera, all tribes, and all named clades. The diversity of growth forms, foliage, flowers and fruits are illustrated for all genera, and for each genus we also provide a distribution map, based on quality-controlled herbarium specimen localities. A glossary for specialised terms used in legume morphology is provided. This new phylogenetically based classification of Caesalpinioideae provides a solid system for communication and a framework for downstream analyses of biogeography, trait evolution and diversification, as well as for taxonomic revision of still understudied genera.
dc.identifierPhytoKeys, v. 240, p. 1–552, 2024.
dc.identifierhttp://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1168164
dc.identifier10.3897/phytokeys.240.101716
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/517649
dc.languageeng
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectDiversity
dc.subjectPhylogenomics
dc.subjectLeguminosae
dc.subjectClassification
dc.subjectFabaceae
dc.subjectMimosoideae
dc.subjectTaxonomy
dc.titleAdvances in legume systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification.
dc.typeArtigo de periódico

Archivos