Revisiting Cheap Talk with New Evidence from a Field Experiment

dc.creatorSilva, Andres
dc.creatorNayga, Rodolfo M., Jr.
dc.creatorCampbell, Benjamin L.
dc.creatorPark, John L.
dc.date2017-04-01T19:35:07Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T05:49:03Z
dc.descriptionWe assess the reduction of hypothetical bias in consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for products by applying a generic, short, and neutral cheap talk script in a retail setting. Using an open-ended elicitation mechanism with non-hypothetical, hypothetical, and hypothetical with cheap talk treatments, our results indicate that the hypothetical WTP values are higher than the nonhypothetical values, but the hypothetical with cheap talk values are not significantly different from non-hypothetical estimates.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.117168
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/117168/files/JARE_Aug2011__04_pp280-291_Silva.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/117168
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/568721
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/117168
dc.titleRevisiting Cheap Talk with New Evidence from a Field Experiment
dc.typeText

Archivos