Madagascar : Decentralization
No hay miniatura disponible
Fecha
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Washington, DC
Resumen
Descripción
The objective of this decentralization
study is to provide analysis and policy advice to the new
Malagasy government on how to proceed with the
decentralization strategy it inherited from the previous
government. The end of the post-crisis emergency recovery
period creates the opportunity to correct the weaknesses of
the previous strategy while building on the exiting
achievements. The paper specifically aims to (i) analyze the
institutional and fiscal context of decentralization and
(ii) present the resulting challenges for service delivery
and financing - with a particular focus on local
governments. Benefiting from primary data from several
hundred local governments, this study aims at proving
recommendations of how to improve the functioning of
communes in considering the institutional and fiscal
parameters. The report is organized into four chapters,
including the Introduction, which explain the political,
institutional, and fiscal determinants that have been
influencing Madagascar's decentralization process, and
which will continue to do so in the future. Chapter 2
provides the political and institutional background needed
to better understand the decentralization context of today.
The chapter analyzes the historical forces of
centralization, which date back to pre-colonial times and
translate into today's dominant role of the central
government administration. The chapter then takes a closer
look at the existing administrative set-up to explain
functions and responsibilities at different levels of
government. To this end, it looks at the regulatory gaps and
inconsistencies in the legal framework, the parallelism
between decentralized and deconcentrated layers, and the
emerging role of inter- communal associations and informal
regional planning bodies. Based on the concept of the
sub-national fiscal gap, chapter 3 analyzes structural
constraints to fiscal decentralization in Madagascar, and in
particular the dominance of revenue items which cannot be
decentralized. Given the l o w degree of fiscal
decentralization, the chapter takes a closer look at
expenditure deconcentration and provides a more in-depth
analysis of deconcentration in the health and education
sectors. The last part of the chapter evaluates
Madagascar's intergovernmental transfers, which
represent the most important source of local government
financing. Communes are the lowest and institutionally most
advanced level of sub-national government in Madagascar.
They are also the main focus of this study. The fourth
chapter describes the institutional dynamics at the local
level to provide the ground for a thorough analysis of local
government finance. The chapter provides an estimate of
local needs, and analyzes revenue and expenditure patterns
based on budget data of a large sample of rural communes.
Palabras clave
DECENTRALIZATION IN GOVERNMENT, LEGAL FRAMEWORK, DECONCENTRATION, SERVICE DELIVERY, REGIONAL PLANNING, FISCAL ADMINISTRATION, INTERGOVERNMENTAL FISCAL RELATIONS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFER OF FUNDS, PUBLIC EXPENDITURES, RESOURCES MOBILIZATION, REVENUE MOBILIZATION, COMMUNAL SETTLEMENTS, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES, INTERGOVERNMENTAL TAX RELATIONS, ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES, SOCIAL EXPENDITURES, INSTITUTIONAL REFORM, POLITICAL ACCOUNTABILITY, BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION, FISCAL REFORMS, MONITORING ACCOUNTABILITY, ACCOUNTING, ADMINISTRATIVE EFFICIENCY, ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS, AUTHORITY, AUTONOMY, BORROWING, BUDGET EXECUTION, BUDGET MANAGEMENT, BUDGETARY RESOURCES, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION, CONSTITUTION, CORPORATE INCOME TAXES, DECENTRALIZATION, DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS, DECENTRALIZATION REFORMS, DECISION- MAKING, DECISION- MAKING POWER, DECISION-MAKING, DECISION-MAKING AUTHORITY, DECONCENTRATION, DECREES, DEVOLUTION, DISTRICTS, ECONOMIC STABILITY, EXECUTION, EXPENDITURE, EXPENDITURE ASSIGNMENTS, FISCAL, FISCAL CENTRALIZATION, FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION, FISCAL DEFICITS, FISCAL GAP, GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES, GOVERNMENT FINANCE, GOVERNMENT MINISTRIES, GOVERNMENT RESOURCES, GOVERNMENT REVENUE, GOVERNMENT REVENUES, GOVERNMENT SERVICES, HOUSING, INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS, INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK, INSTITUTIONAL REFORM, INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONSHIPS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS, LAWS, LEGAL FRAMEWORK, LEGAL SYSTEM, LEGISLATION, LOCAL AUTHORITIES, LOCAL GOVERNMENT, LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE, LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCING, LOCAL GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS, LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVENUE, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, LOCAL REVENUE, LOCAL TAXES, MUNICIPAL REVENUES, NATIONAL CAPACITIES, NATIONAL EXPENDITURES, NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS, POLITICAL CRISIS, POLITICAL DECENTRALIZATION, POOR GOVERNANCE, PRIVATE SECTOR, PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS, PUBLIC ENTERPRISES, PUBLIC EXPENDITURE, PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW, PUBLIC EXPENDITURES, PUBLIC FINANCE, PUBLIC SERVICES, RECURRENT EXPENDITURES, REGIONAL PLANNING, REGULATORY FRAMEWORK, REVENUE ASSIGNMENT, REVENUE COLLECTION, REVENUE MOBILIZATION, REVENUE SOURCES, SALES TAXES, SOCIAL EXPENDITURE, SOCIAL SECTOR, SOCIAL SECTORS, SOCIAL SERVICES, TAX, TAX SHARING, TREASURY
