Uganda Country Assistance Evaluation, 2001-2007

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorIndependent Evaluation Group
dc.creatorAfrica Development Bank
dc.date2015-10-08T18:12:34Z
dc.date2015-10-08T18:12:34Z
dc.date2009
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-01T00:55:12Z
dc.descriptionThe World Bank’s assistance strategies showed strong client orientation and were aligned with Uganda’s poverty reduction strategy. The programs were substantially effective in decentralization, public sector reform, growth and economic transformation, education, and water and sanitation. However, more could have been done to help counter the perception of increasing corruption, improve power supply, reduce transport costs, enhance agricultural productivity, and help with family planning and reproductive health. The AfDB’s assistance was also relevant and aligned with the government’s development goals. Its support substantially achieved its objectives for decentralization, public sector finance, growth and economic transformation, improved competitiveness, agriculture, and water and sanitation, as well as education and health. However, there were some shortcomings in the assistance provided for power and roads and in reducing corruption. This report evaluates World Bank and African Development Bank assistance to Uganda during 2001-07. The motivation to undertake a joint evaluation was the shift to a common strategic framework, the Uganda Joint Assistance Strategy (UJAS), to guide the formulation and delivery of their programs. Under a common strategic framework joint evaluation is, in principal, more cost effective than the equivalent separate evaluations, since at least some aspects of the evaluation can be done together. This also helps to reduce government transaction costs. The evaluation discusses the outcome of the support of each bank, rates each independently, noting that the two banks are of different size, capacity, and institutional setting. In addition, the two banks have programs that were not implemented jointly but in parallel, although they regularly engaged with one another as development partners. The outcome ratings for the two institutions are therefore not comparable and should not be used to imply that one institution did ‘better’ than the other.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formattext/plain
dc.identifierhttp://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/10/25126425/uganda-country-assistance-evaluation-2001-2007
dc.identifier978-1-60244-141-5
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10986/22742
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-60244-141-5
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/412948
dc.languageEnglish
dc.languageen_US
dc.publisherWashington, DC: World Bank
dc.rightsCC BY 3.0 IGO
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/
dc.rightsWorld Bank
dc.subjectTARIFFS
dc.subjectRISKS
dc.subjectFISH
dc.subjectSTRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT
dc.subjectECONOMIC GROWTH
dc.subjectPEOPLE
dc.subjectVACCINATION
dc.subjectPOLICY ENVIRONMENT
dc.subjectENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION
dc.subjectCARBON DIOXIDE
dc.subjectFOREST MANAGEMENT
dc.subjectCARBON
dc.subjectPREVENTION
dc.subjectLAWS
dc.subjectEXPECTATIONS
dc.subjectAGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION
dc.subjectSOCIAL RESEARCH
dc.subjectRESOURCE MANAGEMENT
dc.subjectBALANCE OF PAYMENTS
dc.subjectRESOURCE ALLOCATION
dc.subjectLABOR FORCE
dc.subjectEMISSIONS
dc.subjectHEALTH CARE
dc.subjectREVENUES
dc.subjectSEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS
dc.subjectSUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT
dc.subjectINCENTIVES
dc.subjectHEALTH
dc.subjectCRIME
dc.subjectSUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
dc.subjectAGRICULTURAL OUTPUT
dc.subjectCONDITIONALITY
dc.subjectPUBLIC HEALTH
dc.subjectECONOMIC ANALYSIS
dc.subjectAUDITS
dc.subjectLIFE EXPECTANCY
dc.subjectRESOURCE USE
dc.subjectKNOWLEDGE
dc.subjectPRESENT VALUE
dc.subjectENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
dc.subjectCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
dc.subjectIRON
dc.subjectCROWDING OUT
dc.subjectOIL
dc.subjectIMMUNIZATION
dc.subjectPATIENT
dc.subjectPATIENTS
dc.subjectINTERVENTION
dc.subjectPOPULATION GROWTH
dc.subjectSECONDARY SCHOOLS
dc.subjectCAPITAL FORMATION
dc.subjectOPTIONS
dc.subjectNURSES
dc.subjectQUOTAS
dc.subjectOBSERVATION
dc.subjectVIOLENCE
dc.subjectDEBT
dc.subjectMARKETING
dc.subjectALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY
dc.subjectFORESTRY
dc.subjectECONOMIC POLICIES
dc.subjectNATURAL RESOURCES
dc.subjectMENTAL HEALTH
dc.subjectMORTALITY
dc.subjectSUBSIDIES
dc.subjectSOCIAL SUPPORT
dc.subjectEFFICIENCY
dc.subjectFISHING
dc.subjectTAX REFORMS
dc.subjectLAND USE
dc.subjectNUTRITIONAL STATUS
dc.subjectPRIMARY SCHOOLS
dc.subjectRESOURCES
dc.subjectUNEMPLOYMENT
dc.subjectEQUITY
dc.subjectPOTENTIAL INVESTORS
dc.subjectECONOMIC IMPACT
dc.subjectDIPHTHERIA
dc.subjectRURAL COMMUNITIES
dc.subjectRESEARCH CENTERS
dc.subjectWORKERS
dc.subjectAGED
dc.subjectSOCIAL SERVICES
dc.subjectENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
dc.subjectVALUES
dc.subjectIMMUNODEFICIENCY
dc.subjectHEALTH POLICY
dc.subjectCREDIT
dc.subjectPURCHASING POWER
dc.subjectDIVISION OF LABOR
dc.subjectDEFORESTATION
dc.subjectCPI
dc.subjectDEMAND
dc.subjectHEALTH OUTCOMES
dc.subjectSUSTAINABLE USE
dc.subjectHYGIENE
dc.subjectNATIONAL INCOME
dc.subjectPUBLIC EXPENDITURES
dc.subjectFAMILY PLANNING
dc.subjectEXPENDITURES
dc.subjectENVIRONMENTS
dc.subjectPROPERTY
dc.subjectTAX RATES
dc.subjectCHILD NUTRITION
dc.subjectMEASUREMENT
dc.subjectREFUGEES
dc.subjectNUTRITION
dc.subjectTRANSACTION COSTS
dc.subjectENVIRONMENT
dc.subjectSOIL DEGRADATION
dc.subjectCONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
dc.subjectWORKSHOPS
dc.subjectWEATHER PATTERNS
dc.subjectECONOMICS
dc.subjectTERMS OF TRADE
dc.subjectQUALITY OF LIFE
dc.subjectPRIMARY HEALTH CARE
dc.subjectTAX REVENUE
dc.subjectINTERNET
dc.subjectFISHERIES
dc.subjectWEIGHT
dc.subjectECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
dc.subjectTRADE
dc.subjectLAND
dc.subjectCHILDREN
dc.subjectECONOMIES OF SCALE
dc.subjectCOMMERCIAL BANKS
dc.subjectCOMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE
dc.subjectFARMS
dc.subjectPOPULATION PRESSURES
dc.subjectREVENUE
dc.subjectINSTITUTIONALIZATION
dc.subjectSTRATEGY
dc.subjectREGISTRATION
dc.subjectMEDICINES
dc.subjectENVIRONMENTAL
dc.subjectHOSPITALS
dc.subjectLABOR MARKETS
dc.subjectINTERMEDIARIES
dc.subjectWETLANDS
dc.subjectHEALTH SERVICES
dc.subjectIMPLEMENTATION
dc.subjectCONDOMS
dc.subjectPRICES
dc.subjectECONOMIES
dc.subjectCOMPETITION
dc.titleUganda Country Assistance Evaluation, 2001-2007
dc.titleJoint IEG/OPEV Country Assistance Evaluation
dc.typeBook
dc.typeLivre
dc.typeLibro

Archivos

Colecciones

AgroKnow