The Welfare Effects of Imperfect Harmonization of Trade and Industrial Policy

dc.creatorGatsios, Konstantine
dc.creatorKarp, Larry S.
dc.date2017-04-01T19:49:11Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T04:48:56Z
dc.descriptionPartial cooperation in setting trade policy may be worse than no cooperation for countries who form a customs union. The paper investigates three situations where this is likely to occur. First, if the countries forming the union comprise too small a percentage of the non-competitive sector of the industry, their cooperation may be disadvantageous for essentially the same reason that a merger may be disadvantageous in oligopolistic industries. Second, even if the countries forming the union comprise the entire non-competitive sector of industry, cooperation on trade policy may be disadvantageous if industrial policy (e.g. investment subsidies) are chosen non-cooperatively. The reason is that cooperation in trade policy may exacerbate the inefficiencies created by non-cooperation at an earlier stage. Third, cooperation in choosing trade policies may encourage excessive investment by competitive importers and thus reduce the demand faced by the oligopolists.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.51256
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/51256/files/89-5.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/51256
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/555261
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/51256
dc.titleThe Welfare Effects of Imperfect Harmonization of Trade and Industrial Policy
dc.typeText

Archivos