Rural and urban dynamics and poverty: Evidence from China and India

dc.creatorFan, Shenggen
dc.creatorChan-Kang, Connie
dc.creatorMukherjee, Anit
dc.date2005
dc.date2024-11-21T09:51:17Z
dc.date2024-11-21T09:51:17Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T14:59:20Z
dc.descriptionThis paper explores the dynamic relationship between the rural and urban sectors and the consequent impact on poverty in China and India, both of which followed aggressive urban industrialization paths in the mid-twentieth century. The bulk of the population of each of these countries still resides in the rural areas where the incidence of poverty is greatest....Empirical evidence demonstrates that public investment in the rural sector—particularly in rural infrastructure as well as in agricultural research and development, and education—will yield the largest returns in terms of both growth and poverty reduction. In the poorest areas, such as western China and eastern India, the poverty reduction effect from these investments is particularly high.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/160603
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/91305
dc.languageen
dc.publisherInternational Food Policy Research Institute
dc.rightsOpen Access
dc.sourceFan, Shenggen; Chan-Kang, Connie; Mukherjee, Anit. Rural and urban dynamics and poverty: Evidence from China and India. FCND Discussion Paper Brief. 196. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://hdl.handle.net/10568/160603
dc.subjectpoverty
dc.subjectinvestment policies
dc.subjectindustrialization
dc.titleRural and urban dynamics and poverty: Evidence from China and India
dc.typeBrief

Archivos