The effectiveness of cash and cash plus interventions on livelihoods outcomes: Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.creatorLeight, Jessica
dc.creatorHirvonen, Kalle
dc.creatorZafar, Sarim
dc.date2024-07-19
dc.date2024-07-19T15:57:31Z
dc.date2024-07-19T15:57:31Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T15:01:11Z
dc.descriptionCash transfer programs have become increasingly popular tools for fighting chronic poverty and food insecurity in lowand middle-income countries (Fiszbein and Schady, 2009; USAID, 2022; WFP, 2023). Cash transfers offer recipients flexibility by permitting them to finance immediate consumption needs or to increase future income streams through investments and savings. Moreover, these programs are generally feasible to implement and scale across diverse contexts. While studies consistently show cash transfers effectively reduce poverty in the short term, the evidence on their long-term impact is less clear.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/149161
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/92232
dc.languageen
dc.publisherInternational Food Policy Research Institute
dc.relationhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/148881
dc.rightsOpen Access
dc.sourceLeight, Jessica; Hirvonen, Kalle; and Zafar, Sarim. 2024. The effectiveness of cash and cash plus interventions on livelihoods outcomes: Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/149161
dc.subjectcash transfers
dc.subjectdata
dc.subjectconsumption
dc.subjectlivelihoods
dc.titleThe effectiveness of cash and cash plus interventions on livelihoods outcomes: Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.typeBrief

Archivos