Choosing an appropriate real-life measure of effect size: the case of a continuous predictor and a binary outcome
| dc.creator | Conroy, Ronan M. | |
| dc.date | 2017-04-01T13:54:14Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-09T05:47:16Z | |
| dc.description | A case study of data on age and pregnancy is used to point up some morals for practicing data analysts, including the superiority of regression over t tests, exploratory scatterplot smoothing as a key method of checking form of relationship, and the value of logistic regression followed by adjust as a way of getting at the numbers of most interest. | |
| dc.identifier | Other:st0021 | |
| dc.identifier | doi:10.22004/ag.econ.116011 | |
| dc.identifier | https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/116011/files/sjart_st0021.pdf | |
| dc.identifier | http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/116011 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/568345 | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | ||
| dc.source | http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/116011 | |
| dc.title | Choosing an appropriate real-life measure of effect size: the case of a continuous predictor and a binary outcome | |
| dc.type | Text |
