Quantifying Strategic Choice Along the Vertical Coordination Continuum

dc.creatorWysocki, Allen F.
dc.creatorPeterson, H. Christopher
dc.creatorHarsh, Stephen B.
dc.date2017-04-01T13:47:15Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T04:23:15Z
dc.descriptionThe qualitative and quantitative results of a study undertaken to test a decision framework firms might consider in choosing a vertical coordination strategy are presented. The posited five-step decision making process tested that a change in coordination strategy would occur if and only if a "yes" decision was made at each step. The results reported as case-based frequencies and as a discriminate analysis function provide strong support for the study's research propositions. The ability of an alternative to reduce the costliness of a coordination error and the acceptability of the risk/return tradeoff were critical to the willingness of a sample of producers to change coordination strategy. Implementability was significant, but not to the same extent as costliness of a coordination error or acceptability of the risk/return tradeoff.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.34395
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/34395/files/0603wy01.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/34395
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/549146
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/34395
dc.titleQuantifying Strategic Choice Along the Vertical Coordination Continuum
dc.typeText

Archivos