Playing games in the forest: state-local conflicts of land appropriation

dc.creatorAngelsen, A.
dc.date2001
dc.date2012-06-04T09:06:09Z
dc.date2012-06-04T09:06:09Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T13:58:53Z
dc.descriptionThis paper explores possible strategic interactions between the state and local community in games of tropical forest land appropriation. Three typical cases are discussed, corresponding to a development over time of increased resource competition and market integration. The local response to more state deforestation depends on the costs, market, and behavioral assumptions, and less on the structure of the game (Cournot or Stackelberg). The state fuels local deforestation by providing infrastructure (roads) which reduces the net costs of agricultural expansion, or when markets are imperfect and local behavior determined by survival needs. The game structure is, however, important for total deforestation.
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/18159
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/70123
dc.languageen
dc.sourceAngelsen, A. 2001. Playing games in the forest: state-local conflicts of land appropriation . Land Economics 77 (2) :285-299. ISSN: 0023-7639.
dc.subjectdeforestation
dc.subjectcommunities
dc.subjectgame theory
dc.subjectmodels
dc.subjectresource allocation
dc.subjectland use
dc.subjectland clearance
dc.subjectgovernment
dc.subjectconservation
dc.subjectconflicts
dc.subjectcosts
dc.subjectmarkets
dc.subjecttropical forests
dc.titlePlaying games in the forest: state-local conflicts of land appropriation
dc.typeJournal Article

Archivos