Methane emissions from lambs fed kikuyu hay alone or mixtured with lotus hay

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.audienceInvestigador
dc.coverageColombia
dc.creatorVargas Martínez, Juan de Jesús
dc.creatorPabón Restrepo, Martha Lucia
dc.creatorCarulla Fornaguera, Juan Evangelista
dc.date2024-03-06T20:17:27Z
dc.date2024-03-06T20:17:27Z
dc.date2021
dc.date2021
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-27T04:31:33Z
dc.descriptionDietary inclusion of contain-tannin legumes may reduce enteric methane emission in ruminants. To evaluate methane emissions from sheep fed a kikuyu grass (Cenchrus clandestinus) diet partially substituted with lotus (Lotus uliginosus), twelve growing rams, with 23±2 kg average liveweight, were assigned randomly to two treatments and with three measurement periods in a switchover design. Treatments consisted of 100% kikuyu hay or 70% kikuyu hay: 30% lotus hay and with 6 rams per treatment. Each of three periods lasted 20 d, where the first 15 d were for acclimatization and the last 5 d for measurements. Rams were placed in metabolic cages and fed once a day (8 AM) at 90% of their voluntary feed intake, with free access to drinking water. Feed intake, fecal production and feed digestibility were determined at each period. Methane production was measured for each treatment group of 6 rams using the poly-tunnel technique. Legume addition reduced total methane production (27.6 vs. 23.1 g/animal; p<0.01), methane production per dry matter intake (DMI) (18.8 vs. 12.2 g/kg DMI; p<0.01), methane production per digestible OM (DOM) (36.1 vs. 23.4 g/kg DOM; p<0.01) and methane production per digestible NDF (DNDF) (43.5 vs 34.0 g/kg DNDF; p<0.01). In conclusion, lotus inclusion in pasture systems could be a suitable legume to reduce methane emissions in grazing systems.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://ojs.alpa.uy/index.php/ojs_files/article/view/2823
dc.identifier2075-8359
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/38980
dc.identifier10.53588/alpa.291201
dc.identifierreponame:Biblioteca Digital Agropecuaria de Colombia
dc.identifierinstname:Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria AGROSAVIA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/30333
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherAsociación Latinoamericanos de Producción Animal
dc.relationArchivos latinoamericanos de producción animal
dc.relation29
dc.relation44593
dc.relation1
dc.relation9
dc.relationAnnison, E. F. and D.G. Armstrong. 1970. Physiology of digestion and metabolism in the ruminant. Ed: Oriel Press, Ltd. Newcastle, England.
dc.relationArchimède, H., M. Eugène, C. Magdeleine, M. Boval, C. Martin, D. Morgavi, P. Lecomte and M. Doreau. 2011. Comparison of methane production between C3 y C4 grasses and legumes. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 166­167: 59­64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.003
dc.relationAOAC. 2005. Official methods of analysis. 18th ed. Ed. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. Washington D.C. USA.
dc.relationBhatta, R., Y. Uyeno, A. Takenaka, Y. Yabumoto, I. Nonaka, O. Enishi and M. Kurihara. 2009. Difference in the nature of tannins on in vitro ruminal methane and volatile fatty acid production and on methanogenic archaea and protozoal population. J. Dairy Sci. 92: 5512­5522. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008­1441
dc.relationBetancourt, M., M. Martínez de Acurero, T. Clavero, R. Razz, S. Pietrosemoli y O. Araujo­Febres. 2003. Efecto de la melaza, ácido fórmico y tiempo de fermentación sobre el pH y temperatura en microsilos de Leucaena leucocephala. Rev. Fac. Agron. (LUZ). 20: 493­501. https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/agr onomia/article/view/26475/27101
dc.relationBlaxter K., and J. Clapperton. 1965. Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. Brit. J. Nutr. 19: 511­522. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19650046
dc.relationCarulla, J., M. Kreuzer, A. Machmüller and H. Hess. 2005. Supplementation of Acacia mearnsii tannin decreases methanogenesis and urinary nitrogen in forage­fed sheep. Aust. J. Agr. Res. 56: 961­970. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR05022
dc.relationCarulla, J., and E. Ortega. 2016. Sistemas de producción lechera en Colombia: Retos y oportunidades. Arch. Latinoam. Prod. Anim. 24: 83­87. https://ojs.alpa.uy/index.php/ojs_files/article/vie w/2526
dc.relationCastro, E., J. Mojica, J. León, M. Pabón, J. Carulla and E. Cárdenas. 2008. Productividad de pasturas y producción de leche bovina bajo pastoreo de gramínea y gramínea + Lotus uliginosus en Mosquera, Colombia. Rev. Med. Vet. Zoot. 55: 9­21. https://doi.org/10.15446/rfmvz
dc.relationGerber, P., H. Steinfeld, B. Henderson, A. Mottet, C. Opio, J. Dijkman, A. Falcucci and G. Tempio. 2013, Tackling climate change through livestock – A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Roma, Italia.
dc.relationHess, H., L. Monsalve, C. Lascano, J. Carulla, T. Díaz and M Kreuzer. 2003. Supplementation of a tropical grass diet with forage legumes and Sapindus saponaria fruits: effects on in vitro ruminal nitrogen turnover and methanogenesis. Aust. J. Agr. Res. 54: 703­713. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR02241
dc.relationJanssen, P. 2010. Influence of hydrogen on rumen methane formation and fermentation balances through microbial growth kinetics and fermentation thermodynamics. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 160: 1­22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.07.002
dc.relationJohnson, K., and D.E. Johnson. 1995. Methane emissions from cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 73: 2483­2492. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.7382483x
dc.relationLee, J., S. Woodward, G. Waghorn and D. Clark. 2004. Methane emissions by dairy cows fed increasing proportions of white clover (Trifolium repens) in pasture. Pr. N. Z. Grassl. Assoc. 66: 151­155. https://www.grassland.org.nz/publications/nzgra ssland_publication_430.pdf
dc.relationLopes, J., L. de Matos, M. Harper, F. Giallongo, J. Oh, D. Gruen, S. Ono, M. Kindermann, S. Duval and A. Hristov. 2016. Effect of 3­nitrooxypropanol on methane and hydrogen emissions, methane isotopic signature, and ruminal fermentation in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 99: 5335­5344. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015­10832
dc.relationLovett, D., D. McGilloway, A. Bortolozzo, M. Hawkins, J. Callan, B. Flynn and F. O´Mara. 2005. In vitro fermentation patterns and methane production as influenced by cultivar and season of harvest of Lolium perenne L. Grass Forage Sci. 61: 9­21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365­2494.2006.00500.x
dc.relationLovett, D., A. Bortolozzo, P. Conaghan, P. O´Kiely and F. O´Mara. 2004. In vitro total and methane gas production as influenced by rate of nitrogen application, season of harvest and perennial ryegrass cultivar. Grass Forage Sci. 59: 227­232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365­2494.2004.00421.x
dc.relationMartínez, R., N. Martínez and M. Martínez. 2011. Diseño de experimentos en ciencias agropecuarias y biológicas con SAS, SPSS, R y Statistix. 1st Edition. Ed: Fondo Nacional Universitario. Bogotá, Colombia
dc.relationMakkar, H. 2016. Smart livestock feeding strategies for Makkar, H. 2016. Smart livestock feeding strategies for harvesting triple gain – the desired outcomes in planet, people and profit dimensions: a developing country perspective. Anim. Prod. Sci. 56: 519­534. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15557
dc.relationMcCaughey, W., K. Wittenberg and D. Corrigan. 1999. Impact of pasture on methane production by lactating beef cows. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 79: 221­226. https://doi.org/10.4141/A98­107
dc.relationMolina, I., E. Angarita, O. Mayorga, J. Chará and R. Barahona. 2016, Effect of Leucaena leucocephala on methane production of Lucerna heifers fed a diet base don Cynodon plectostachyus. Livest. Sci. 185: 24­ 29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.01.009
dc.relationMorales, A., J. León, E. Cárdenas, G. Afanador and J. Carulla. 2013, Composición química de la leche, digestibilidad in vitro de la materia seca y producción en vacas alimentadas con gramíneas solas o asociadas con Lotus uliginosus. Rev. Med. Vet. Zoot. 60: 32­48. https://doi.org/10.15446/rfmvz
dc.relationMoss, A., J. Jouany and J. Newbold. 2000. Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming. Ann. Zoot. 49: 231­253. https://doi.org/ff10.1051/animres:2000119
dc.relationMurphy, M., R. Baldwin and L. Koong. 1982. Murphy, M., R. Baldwin and L. Koong. 1982. Estimation of stoichiometric parameters for rumen fermentation of roughage and concentrate diets. J Anim. Sci. 55: 411­421. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1982.552411x
dc.relationNewbold, C., E Ramos. 2020. Ruminal microbiome and microbial metabolome: effects of diet and ruminant host. Animal. 14:78­86. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119003252
dc.relationParra, D., and M. Avila. 2010. Determinación de los parámetros fisiológicos y dinámica ruminal de bovinos en condiciones de poli­túnel para evaluar emisiones de metano en trópico alto y bajo colombiano. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias. Universidad de Cundinamarca. Fusagasugá, Colombia.
dc.relationPatra, A., and J. Saxena. 2010. Review: A new perspective on the use of plant secondary metabolites to inhibit methanogenesis in the rumen. Phytochemistry. 71: 1198­1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.05.010
dc.relationPinares­Patiño, C., J. McEwan, K. Dodds, E. Cardenas, R. Hegarty, J. Koolaard and H. Clark. 2011. Repeatability of methane emissions from sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 166: 210­218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.068
dc.relationPinares­Patiño, C., G. Waghorn, A. Machmüller, B. Vlaming, G. Molano, A. Cavanagh and H. Clark. 2007. Methane emissions and digestive physiology of non­lactating dairy cows fed pasture forages. Can J. Anim. Sci. 87: 601­613. https://doi.org/10.4141/CJAS06023
dc.relationPinares­Patiño, C., M. Ulyatt, K. Lassey, T. Barry and C. Holmes. 2003. Rumen function and digestion parameters associated with differences between sheep in methane emissions when fed chaffed Lucerne hay. J. Agr. Sci. 140: 205­214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859603003046
dc.relationRibeiro­Filho, H., R. Delagarde and J. Peyraud. 2005. Herbage intake and milk yield of dairy cows grazing perennial ryegrass swards or white clover/perennial ryegrass swards at low and medium herbage allowance. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 119: 13­27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.12.009
dc.relationStürm, C., T. Tiemann, C. Lascano, M. Kreuzer and H. Hess. 2007. Nutrient composition and in vitro ruminal fermentation of tropical legume mixtures with contrasting tannin contents. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 138: 29­46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.11.008
dc.relationTavendale, M., L. Meagher, D. Pacheco, N. Walker, G. Attwood and S. Sivakumaran. 2005. Methane production from in vitro rumen incubations with Lotus pedunculatus and Medicago sativa, and effects of extractable condensed tannin fractions on methanogenesis. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 123­124: 403­ 419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.04.037
dc.relationTerrill, T., A. Rowan, G. Douglas and T. Barry. 1992. Determination of extractable and bound condensed tannin concentration in forage plants, protein concentrated meals and cereal grains. J. Sci. Food Agr. 58: 321­329. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740580306
dc.relationTiemann, T., C. Lascano, H. Wettstein, A. Mayer, M. Kreuzer and H. Hess. 2008a. Effect of the tropical tannin­rich shrub legumes Calliandra calothyrsus and Flemingia macrophylla on methane emission and nitrogen and energy balance in growing labs. Animal. 2: 790­799. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731108001791
dc.relationTiemann, T., C. Lascano, M. Kreuzer and H. Hess. 2008b. The ruminal degradability of fiber explains part of the low nutritional value and reduced methanogenesis in highly tanniferous tropical legumes. J. Sci. Food Agr. 88:1794­1803. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3282
dc.relationVan Soest, P., J. Robertson and B. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral fiber and no starch polysaccharides in relation to nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74: 3583­3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022­ 0302(91)78551­2
dc.relationVargas, J., A. Sierra, J. Benavidez, Y. Avellaneda, O. Mayorga and C. Ariza. 2018a. Establecimiento y producción de raigrás y trébol en dos regiones del trópico alto colombiano. Agron. Mesoam. 29:177­ 191. https://doi.org/10.15517/ma.v29i1.28077
dc.relationVargas, J., M. Pabón and J. Carulla. 2018b. Methane production from four forages at three maturity stages in a ruminal in vitro system. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Pecu. 31: 120­129. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.v31n2a05
dc.relationVargas, J., M. Pabón and J. Carulla. 2014. Producción de metano in vitro en mezcla de gramíneas leguminosas del trópico alto colombiano. Arch. Zootec. 63: 397­407. http://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S0004­ 05922014000300001
dc.relationWaghorn, G. 2008. Beneficial and detrimental effects of dietary condensed tannins for sustainable sheep and goat production ­ Progress and challenges. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 147: 116­139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.09.013
dc.relationWaghorn, G., H. Clark, V. Taufa and A. Cavanagh. 2007. Monensin controlled release capsules for improved production and mitigating methane in dairy cows fed pasture. Proc. New. Zeal. Soc. An. 67: 266­271. http://www.sciquest.org.nz/node/147512
dc.relationWoodward, S., G. Waghorn and P. Laboyrie. 2004. Condensed tannins in birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) reduce methane emissions from dairy cows. Proc. New. Zeal. Soc. An. 64: 160­164.
dc.relationWoodward, S., G. Waghorn, M. Ulyatt and K. Lassey. 2001. Early indications that feeding Lotus will reduce methane emissions from ruminants. Proc. New. Zeal. Soc. An. 61: 23­26
dc.rightsAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
dc.sourceArchivos latinoamericanos de producción animal; Vol. 29, Núm. 44593 (2021): Archivos latinoamericanos de producción animal;p. 1 -9.
dc.subjectAlimentación animal - L02
dc.subjectOvinos
dc.subjectAlimentación de ovinos
dc.subjectMetano
dc.subjectPennisetum clandestinum
dc.subjectGanadería y especies menores
dc.subjecthttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7030
dc.subjecthttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_64161801
dc.subjecthttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4784
dc.subjecthttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5675
dc.thumbnailhttps://repository.agrosavia.co/bitstreams/b00c5e62-78bc-408b-9f08-c1353f2b2a72/download
dc.titleMethane emissions from lambs fed kikuyu hay alone or mixtured with lotus hay
dc.typeArtículo científico

Archivos

Colecciones

Científico