Empirical Evidence Showing The Relationships Between Three Approaches For Pollution Control

dc.creatorWilson, Clevo
dc.date2017-04-01T14:10:10Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T04:43:57Z
dc.descriptionWillingness to pay models have shown the theoretical relationships between the contingent valuation, cost of illness and the avertive behaviour approaches. In this paper, field survey data are used to compare the relationships between these three approaches and to demonstrate that contingent valuation bids exceed the sum of cost of illness and the avertive behaviour approach estimates. The estimates provide a validity check for CV bids and further support the claim that contingent valuation studies are theoretically consistent.
dc.identifierOther:ISSN: 1327-8231
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.48952
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/48952/files/WP71.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/48952
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/554133
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/48952
dc.titleEmpirical Evidence Showing The Relationships Between Three Approaches For Pollution Control
dc.typeText

Archivos