Evaluating Anti-Poverty Programs
| dc.creator | Ravallion, Martin | |
| dc.date | 2012-06-18T20:11:35Z | |
| dc.date | 2012-06-18T20:11:35Z | |
| dc.date | 2005-06 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-01T01:23:41Z | |
| dc.description | The author critically reviews the methods available for the ex-post counterfactual analysis of programs that are assigned exclusively to individuals, households, or locations. The discussion covers both experimental and non-experimental methods (including propensity-score matching, discontinuity designs, double and triple differences, and instrumental variables). Two main lessons emerge. First, despite the claims of advocates, no single method dominates; rigorous, policy-relevant evaluations should be open-minded about methodology. Second, future efforts to draw more useful lessons from evaluations will call for more policy-relevant measures and deeper explanations of measured impacts than are possible from the classic ("black box") assessment of mean impact. | |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.format | text/plain | |
| dc.identifier | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2005/06/8962410/evaluating-anti-poverty-programs | |
| dc.identifier | https://hdl.handle.net/10986/8341 | |
| dc.identifier | https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3625 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/417691 | |
| dc.language | English | |
| dc.publisher | World Bank, Washington, DC | |
| dc.relation | Policy Research Working Paper; No. 3625 | |
| dc.rights | CC BY 3.0 IGO | |
| dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ | |
| dc.rights | World Bank | |
| dc.subject | ACTIVE LABOR MARKET PROGRAMS | |
| dc.subject | AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION | |
| dc.subject | AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY | |
| dc.subject | AID DONORS | |
| dc.subject | ANTI-POVERTY | |
| dc.subject | ANTIPOVERTY PROGRAMS | |
| dc.subject | CASH TRANSFERS | |
| dc.subject | CHILD MORTALITY | |
| dc.subject | CHILD NUTRITION | |
| dc.subject | COMPARISON GROUPS | |
| dc.subject | CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURES | |
| dc.subject | CONTROL GROUPS | |
| dc.subject | COUNTERFACTUAL | |
| dc.subject | COUNTERFACTUALS | |
| dc.subject | DATA COLLECTION | |
| dc.subject | DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH | |
| dc.subject | DIFFERENCE ESTIMATORS | |
| dc.subject | ECONOMIC GROWTH | |
| dc.subject | EGS | |
| dc.subject | EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME | |
| dc.subject | EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS | |
| dc.subject | EVALUATION DESIGN | |
| dc.subject | EVALUATION METHODS | |
| dc.subject | EVALUATORS | |
| dc.subject | EXPERIMENTS | |
| dc.subject | FARM ACTIVITIES | |
| dc.subject | FARMERS | |
| dc.subject | FIELD WORK | |
| dc.subject | FINANCIAL SUPPORT | |
| dc.subject | FLEXIBILITY | |
| dc.subject | FOOD CONSUMPTION | |
| dc.subject | GDP | |
| dc.subject | HEADCOUNT INDEX | |
| dc.subject | HOUSEHOLD INCOME | |
| dc.subject | HOUSEHOLD SIZE | |
| dc.subject | HOUSEHOLD SURVEY | |
| dc.subject | HOUSEHOLD SURVEY DATA | |
| dc.subject | IMPACT ASSESSMENT | |
| dc.subject | IMPACT EVALUATION | |
| dc.subject | IMPACT ON POVERTY | |
| dc.subject | IMPACTS ON POVERTY | |
| dc.subject | INCIDENCE OF POVERTY | |
| dc.subject | INCOME | |
| dc.subject | INCOME GAINS | |
| dc.subject | INEQUALITY | |
| dc.subject | INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS | |
| dc.subject | INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES | |
| dc.subject | INSURANCE | |
| dc.subject | INTERVENTION | |
| dc.subject | INTERVENTIONS | |
| dc.subject | INTERVIEWS | |
| dc.subject | LABOR MARKET PROGRAMS | |
| dc.subject | LABOR MARKETS | |
| dc.subject | LANDLESS HOUSEHOLDS | |
| dc.subject | LIVING STANDARDS | |
| dc.subject | LONGITUDINAL DATA | |
| dc.subject | MEASURES OF POVERTY | |
| dc.subject | MINIMUM INCOME | |
| dc.subject | MODELING | |
| dc.subject | MONITORING DATA | |
| dc.subject | NONEXPERIMENTAL METHODS | |
| dc.subject | NUTRITION | |
| dc.subject | NUTRITIONAL STATUS | |
| dc.subject | OUTCOME INDICATORS | |
| dc.subject | POOR | |
| dc.subject | POOR AREAS | |
| dc.subject | POOR COUNTRIES | |
| dc.subject | POOR FAMILIES | |
| dc.subject | POOR INFRASTRUCTURE | |
| dc.subject | POOR PEOPLE | |
| dc.subject | POVERTY DYNAMICS | |
| dc.subject | POVERTY IMPACTS | |
| dc.subject | POVERTY INCIDENCE | |
| dc.subject | POVERTY LINE | |
| dc.subject | POVERTY LINES | |
| dc.subject | POVERTY MEASURES | |
| dc.subject | PROGRAM COVERAGE | |
| dc.subject | PROGRAM EXPANSION | |
| dc.subject | PROGRAMS | |
| dc.subject | PROJECT MONITORING | |
| dc.subject | PUBLIC SPENDING | |
| dc.subject | QUANTITATIVE SURVEYS | |
| dc.subject | RESEARCH WORKING PAPERS | |
| dc.subject | RURAL | |
| dc.subject | RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE | |
| dc.subject | RURAL ROAD | |
| dc.subject | RURAL ROADS | |
| dc.subject | SANITATION | |
| dc.subject | SELECTION BIAS | |
| dc.subject | SIMULATION | |
| dc.subject | SIMULATION METHODS | |
| dc.subject | SIMULATIONS | |
| dc.subject | SOCIAL EXPERIMENTS | |
| dc.subject | SOCIAL FUNDS | |
| dc.subject | SOCIAL SPENDING | |
| dc.subject | SPECIFICATION TESTS | |
| dc.subject | SURVEY DATA | |
| dc.subject | SURVEY DESIGN | |
| dc.subject | TARGETING | |
| dc.subject | TRAINING PROGRAMS | |
| dc.subject | TREATMENT EFFECTS | |
| dc.subject | VALIDITY | |
| dc.subject | WAGES | |
| dc.subject | WEIGHTING | |
| dc.title | Evaluating Anti-Poverty Programs |
