Analysis and Discussion about Quantitative Grading Standard for Salary Promotion of Agricultural Scientific Researchers

dc.creatorZou, Xingquan
dc.creatorZhang, Jia
dc.creatorYan, Chengxing
dc.creatorQing, Mingjing
dc.date2017-04-01T17:54:00Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T07:22:42Z
dc.descriptionThe existing performance salary system has several grades in the same job title. When the number of workers qualified for promotion is more than the target, quantitative grading is usually adopted to determine salary promotion personnel. Scientific, fair and reasonable grading content and standard directly concern income and remuneration of scientific researchers, and also concern recognition and respect degree of contribution made by scientific researchers. Therefore, quantitative grading standard is of the utmost importance to keeping stability, arousing enthusiasm and creativity of scientific researchers, and promoting smooth development of scientific research. Achievements awarded, papers published and project research can reflect scientific research level, ability and working performance of agricultural scientific researchers. This paper takes these three items as examples, analyzes, discusses and compares the establishment and evaluation of quantitative grading standard. It states that “one yardstick” and “one vote veto system” should be adhered to when evaluating using the quantitative grading standard. It is expected to provide reference for organizations of the same trade in establishing quantitative grading standard and conducting evaluation.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.155874
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/155874/files/29.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/155874
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/587624
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/155874
dc.titleAnalysis and Discussion about Quantitative Grading Standard for Salary Promotion of Agricultural Scientific Researchers
dc.typeText

Archivos