Comparison of Two Angler Data Collection Methods In North Dakota
| dc.creator | Baltezore, James F. | |
| dc.creator | Leitch, Jay A. | |
| dc.creator | Vachal, Shawn R. | |
| dc.date | 2017-04-01T20:20:27Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-09T04:48:32Z | |
| dc.description | North Dakota's recreational fishing industry is an important part of the state's economic base. Resident and nonresident anglers spent nearly $260 million dollars on fishing-related activities in the state in 1990 (Baltezore and Leitch 1992). Management of a resource that generates this amount of economic activity requires accurate and periodic information. Management uses information in at least two ways. Information is initially used to make a decision. Once a decision is made, additional information is collected to assess the results or outcomes of that decision. In effect, information is used to make a decision and monitor changes resulting from that decision (Kerestes and Leitch 1983). Periodic information is needed to monitor the outcomes of management's decision. | |
| dc.identifier | doi:10.22004/ag.econ.51163 | |
| dc.identifier | https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/51163/files/No.173.pdf | |
| dc.identifier | http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/51163 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/555181 | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | ||
| dc.source | http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/51163 | |
| dc.title | Comparison of Two Angler Data Collection Methods In North Dakota | |
| dc.type | Text |