Using Assurance Contract to Encourage Private Provision of Ecosystem Services: Evidence from a Pilot Field Experiment

dc.creatorLiu, Pengfei
dc.creatorSwallow, Stephen K.
dc.date2017-04-01T19:48:08Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-09T09:17:05Z
dc.descriptionWe generalize the dominant assurance contract (Tabarrok, 1998) to the threshold public good provision. This contract offers, to donors who agree to a minimum price, an assurance payment as compensation in the event that fundraising fails to achieve the threshold needed to fund the good. We analyze the outcomes when individuals face 1) a minimum price for eligibility for the assurance payment and 2) an assurance payment that differs from the suggested price. We report a field experiment to fund bird habitat in Rhode Island, USA. An increase of assurance payment does not necessarily increase donations; however, for online donation data, we find positive evidence that the assurance payment can increase donation probability. Assurance payments could potentially improve fundraising success and the private provision of public goods.
dc.identifierdoi:10.22004/ag.econ.205384
dc.identifierhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/205384/files/Poster_LIU_SWALLOW_AAEA2015.pdf
dc.identifierhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/205384
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/607469
dc.languageeng
dc.publisher
dc.sourcehttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/205384
dc.titleUsing Assurance Contract to Encourage Private Provision of Ecosystem Services: Evidence from a Pilot Field Experiment
dc.typeText

Archivos