AUGUSTO GUERREIRO FONTOURA COSTA, CNPA; ANDRÉ NUNES SILVA; VALDINEI SOFIATTI, CNPA; PEDRO LUIS DA COSTA AGUIAR ALVES, UNESP.2026-06-30http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/378155This study evaluated the efficacy of herbicides associated with harvested sugarcane residues in controlling U. decumbens. Herbicides were applied with or without sugarcane straw during U. decumbens pre-emergence (imazapic, imazethapyr + flumioxazin, diclosulam, s-metolachlor, clomazone, sulfentrazone, sulfentrazone + flumioxazin, diclosulam, s-metolachlor, clomazone, sulfentrazone, sulfentrazone + diuron, pyroxasulfone and trifluralin) and post emergence (imazapic, imazethapyr, bentazon + imazamox, quizalofop-p-ethyl, clethodim, haloxyfop-p-methyl, fluazifop-p-butyl, propaquizafop, and glyphosate).openAccessArachis hypogaea LSaccharum officinarum LHerbicideGrama sinalizadoraSignal grassAmendoimCana de AçúcarHerbicidaControle QuímicoPeanutsChemical controlSugarcaneAssociation between herbicides and sugarcane straw for controlling Urochloa decumbens (Stapf) R. D. Webster in peanuts.Artigo de periódico